Oh, for Fsck's sake...
Nov. 16th, 2006 09:58 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
gwywnnyddhttp://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003432992_hunger16.html
Where do I start? I *hate* arguing semantics.
Where do I start? I *hate* arguing semantics.
gwywnnyddgwywnnyddgwywnnydd
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Where do you start? with your vote and voice.
Date: 2006-11-16 10:37 pm (UTC)why not leave the "nutritionally challenged" to do it?
Words have power, so to avoid the words we use others that bother us less rather than address the problem. Hunger is just another one, Poverty, War, Murder, we sugar coat them all...
This report tries to say that if you don't have anything to eat that's OK... it's only when you don't have anything to eat for long enough that it's a problem... Hmmm, that applies to a lot of things doesn't it? Air, water, shelter, come to mind.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 06:47 am (UTC)